Hepatitis
B: Understanding the Concepts and Treatment Recommendations
Howard P. Monsour Jr., MD and Joseph Galati, MD
St. Luke’s Texas Liver Institute Houston,
Texas
Hepatitis B virus is a DNA virus transmitted by blood,
sexual contact, or percutaneous exposures. In the United States, the most
common modes of transmission are sexual and parenteral (horizontal transmission).
In Asia, where hepatitis B is much more common than in the United States,
transmission from mother to child (vertical transmission) is the most
common mode. The hepatitis B virus itself is a partially double-stranded
DNA virus. It replicates through an RNA intermediate. Hepatitis B is a
strongly hepatotrophic virus; however, it can replicate and is present
in many extrahepatic tissues including peripheral blood mononuclear cells
and lymph nodes.
Download PowerPoint slide showing Modes of Transmission
There are four open reading frames for the hepatitis B virus that
encode for four major proteins. The identification of three of these
major proteins is utilized in diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis
B. These include hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). This is an envelope
protein that when present in the blood indicates infection. The infection
identified by the presence of HBsAg can be further delineated into
infection with the presence of viral replication (HbsAg and HBV-DNA
positive) or non-replication (HBsAg and HBV-DNA negative) The hepatitis
B core antigen (HBcAg) protein is found in the inner core of the hepatitis
B virus. It is not secreted into the serum but is expressed on the
hepatocyte surface. It is also located in the nuclei of the hepatocytes.
Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) is a secretory form of the hepatitis
B core antigen. Its presence indicates active viral replication and
increased infectivity. This was the main laboratory determinant used
to indicate active viral replication before the development of assays
that directly measure the virus (HBV-DNA). The HBV-DNA test has become
the most valued method if a patient is infective or in the replicative
phase of the infection.
Antibodies to these proteins are developed in response to infection.
The main antibodies of clinical interest are the hepatitis B surface
antibody (HBsAb) that indicates immunity to hepatitis B and the hepatitis
B e antibody (HBeAb) that indicates in most cases cessation of infectivity
or non-replication. The presence of the hepatitis B core antibody (HbcAb)
is utilized to identify acute infection by measuring the HBcAb-IgM
component of the antibody. The presence of only HBcAb-IgG with out
IgM indicates only exposure to the hepatitis B infection and does not
delineate the activity state (replicative or nonreplicative phase).
Once the patient is infected with hepatitis B, he or she will develop
an acute infection. The outcome of hepatitis B, i.e.-chronicity, depends
on the immune state of the host. If the hepatitis B is acquired when
the immune status of an individual is immature, such as with vertical
transmission to a neonate, the chronicity rate ranges around 90%. If
the immune status of the individual is strong, i.e. adult, the chronicity
rate of hepatitis B drops to less than 10%. The immune status of an
individual may be affected by age, various other states such as coinfection
with HIV, patients undergoing immunosuppression after organ transplantation
or those receiving chemotherapy.
Only 30-to-50% of patients with chronic hepatitis B actually give
a past history of acute hepatitis. This is especially true in areas
where the mode of transmission is predominantly vertical (perinatal
infection). Many patients with chronic hepatitis B are asymptomatic
until they progress to decompensated cirrhosis or have extrahepatic
manifestations. Extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis B are mediated
through circulating immune complexes. This occurs in approximately
10-to-20% of patients with chronic hepatitis B. The two major extrahepatic
complications for chronic hepatitis B are polyarteritis nodosa and
glomerular nephropathies. Antiviral therapy may help those with polyarteritis
but is unlikely to help most patients with glomerular disease.
Patients with active replicating hepatitis B may tolerate the infection
quite well without the development of chronic liver disease (immune
tolerance). The lack of liver disease in these patients despite high
levels of hepatitis B replication is the hallmark of these individuals.
Immune tolerance is believed to be the key reason that Asian patients
who have acquired their hepatitis B through horizontal transmission
are poor responders to interferon therapy in which its major effect
is through augmentation of the immune system. The immune tolerance
phase can last up to 10-to-30 years. At that time, there is a very
low rate of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) clearance. Afterwards, the
hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) conversion to hepatitis B e antibody
(HBeAb) increases. During this immune clearance phase, spontaneous
hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) clearance occurs at the annual rate of
10-to-20%. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion is often accompanied
by abrupt increases in transaminases. This is believed to be due to
the sudden increase in hepatocyte lysis. This is often preceded by
an increase in the hepatitis B viral DNA levels. This occurs most often
in men.
In some patients, the immune response against the hepatitis B virus
is enough to suppress replication but not enough to eradicate the virus.
(Eradication is indicated by the appearance of hepatitis B surface
antibodies (HbsAb). These patients are identified as hepatitis B surface
antigen (HBsAg) positive carriers. This state is also referred to as
a non-replicative phase of hepatitis B. In these individuals, the hepatitis
B viral DNA in the serum when measured is negative. These patients
have normal transaminases (ALT/AST). These patients generally have
a good prognosis and are unlikely to develop cirrhosis or hepatocellular
carcinoma. In HbsAg positive and HBV-DNA negative in the past who did
show progression in the past it is now believed that most of these
cases occurred due to the poor sensitivity of hepatitis B virus DNA
testing, i.e.-these patients actually had low-level replication of
hepatitis B viral DNA that was undetectable by old less sensitive methods.
The squeal of hepatitis B depends on the activity of infection, i.e.-replicative
(HBV-DNA positive) or non-replicative (HBV-DNA negative) phase. Chronic
carries are not replicating virus (HbsAg positive, HBV-DNA negative)
Those who are HBsAg negative, HBeAb antibody positive have an excellent
prognosis. Chronic replicative HBeAg positive and HBV-DNA positive
patients are at greater risk of dying from liver disease or hepatocellular
carcinoma than those with non-replicative (inactive) disease. Five-year
survival rates in nonreplicative patients with early histologic changes
on liver biopsy are higher (97%) than those patients with active (replicative)
hepatitis (85%). Development of cirrhosis in patients with active hepatitis
B is associated with a five-year survival rate of only 50%. Active
HBV patients who have compensated cirrhosis develop hepatic decompensation
over five years in approximately 20%. Compensated cirrhotics will develop
hepatocellular carcinoma at a five-year rate of 6-to-15%.
The prognosis in patients who are HBeAg positive is worse and an important
factor is making treatment decisions. The incidence of hepatocellular
carcinoma is significantly higher in these patients. The e antigen
status is an independent predictor after adjusting for other co-variants
including coinfection with hepatitis C, alcohol intake, and cigarette
smoking in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. In reality,
this represents a prolonged replicative phase of the hepatitis B viral
infection with increased duration of necroinflammation. In fact, hepatitis
B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion represents transition from chronic
hepatitis B to an inactive hepatitis B surface antigen carrier state.
For these individuals, there is little clinical evidence of hepatitis,
and the hepatitis B viral DNA levels are low or nonexistent.
Download PowerPoint slide showing HBV and HCV Characteristics
Hepatitis B Mutations
There is a natural occurring mutant form of hepatitis B that does
not produce hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). These patients will be HBV-DNA
positive. HBeAg and HBeAb will be undetected. This occurs because of
the mutation in the precore or core promoter region. These patients
are referred to as hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative chronic hepatitis
B patients. It is important to recognize these individuals as they
may have a poorer prognosis. The mutation results in a stop codon that
blocks the production of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) production.
This is a mutation that occurs in patients who already have wild type
virus. This can occur at anytime during the active disease process.
Thirty-to-forty percent of these patients experience persistently high
elevated ALT levels. The rest develop an erratic pattern of ALT elevation
with frequent flares. In these patients, the hepatitis B viral DNA
levels tend to be very high. Spontaneous remission is very uncommon.
The long-term prognosis in these patients is very poor.
Other mutations also occur with the hepatitis B virus, but these are
most often secondary to selective pressure during treatment. The most
common mutation is referred to as the YMDD mutation. This occurs with
selective pressure in those patients being treated with lamivudine.
Genotypes
There are eight known genotypes of the hepatitis B virus. These genotypes,
analogous to hepatitis C, occur at different rates in different parts
of the world. Currently, data concerning these genotypes is sparse.
It appears that specific genotypes may have some relationship to clinical
outcome and the response to antiviral therapy. However, testing for
these genotypes is not currently recommended.
Evaluating the Patient with Hepatitis B
All patients who are identified to have chronic hepatitis B infection
should have a complete evaluation, which should include the testing
of the various hepatitis B proteins. This would include most importantly
hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B viral DNA levels (HBV-DNA).
Other common liver diseases should be ruled out, especially hepatitis
C infection. It may also be important to consider testing for anti-HDV.
A liver biopsy to grade and stage the liver disease is recommended
in most patients who meet the criteria for chronic hepatitis. Patients
should also be tested for exposure to hepatitis A and should receive
two doses of hepatitis A vaccine if they have not been previously exposed.
Patients should be instructed to avoid alcohol.
Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
In patients with chronic hepatitis B, consideration for screening
for hepatocellular carcinoma should be given. As of yet, the exact
mode of screening is debated. Patients who should be screened include
those who are noncirrhotic and those who have cirrhosis. Noncirrhotic
patients who are at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma include
Asian males over the age of 40, Asian females over the age of 50, Asians
of any age with a family history of hepatocellular carcinoma, and African-Americans
or blacks from other countries over the age of 20. Any hepatitis B
carrier who has stable, persistent, elevated alpha-fetoprotein should
also be considered in a surveillance program. All cirrhotics need to
be included for hepatocellular carcinoma screening regardless of other
cofactors. The exact method of screening is again debatable. It is
generally agreed that alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) measurements should be
performed at six-month intervals. The radiologic method of screening
can either be with ultrasound at six months or yearly intervals, or
yearly triple phase CT or MRI. Hepatocellular carcinoma generally begins
as an encapsulated single tumor with a doubling time from 2-to-12 months.
For this reason screening earlier, i.e.-every three-to-six months,
does not appear to be more effective than screening 6 months and 12
months. AFP in the US population has a high predict negative predictive
value.
Treatment of Hepatitis B
Recently, treatment guidelines have been published which should be
followed. The main criteria in treatment decision includes the presence
or absence of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), threshold levels of hepatitis
B viral DNA (HBV-DNA) and the presence or absence of cirrhosis. The
goal of therapy should be to eliminate or significantly suppress the
hepatitis B viral replication. This ultimately will result in prevention
of progression of liver disease to cirrhosis or the further decompensation
of the cirrhotic patient and the inhibition of developing hepatocellular
carcinoma. Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion indicates that
antiviral therapy may be stopped and a high likelihood that viral replication
will continue to be nonexistent.
Currently, there are three approved treatment
modalities in the United States, interferon, lamivudine, and adefovir
dipivoxil. Interferon is an injectable medication that has limitations.
Lamivudine and Adefovir are oral medications. Lamivudine’s
major drawback is the strong likelihood of development of mutation
in the hepatitis B virus allowing it to escape the viral suppressive
effects of lamivudine. This occurs in up to 66% of patients after
four years of therapy. For this reason, Adefovir is becoming the
treatment of choice in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection.
Interferon offers a benefit of treatment in the fact that it has
a 30-to-40% seroconversion rate of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)
to hepatitis B e antibody (HBeAb). The durability of this response
appears to be 80-to-90% in patients after four-to-eight years of
follow-up.
Seroconversion, i.e.-e antigen to e antibody, is preferable to just
e antigen loss alone. Furthermore, with oral medications, durability
of e antigen seroconversion may be affected by the duration of treatment
after e antigen seroconversion. Thus, data supports the continuation
of treatment with oral preparations for at least four-to-six months
after e antigen seroconversion (lamivudine or adefovir).
Treatment Recommendations
The decision to treat HBV patients is dependant
upon e antigen status and positive hepatitis B viral DNA levels.
Those patients who are e antigen positive with hepatitis B viral
DNA levels greater than 105should be considered for treatment. Patients
who have hepatitis B viral DNA levels less than 105 with normal ALT
do not need treatment. A liver biopsy may be particularly important
in these patients as evidence of significant histological disease
may tilt one towards treatment. If it decided upon not to treat these “low virus” patients
they should be monitored every 6 to 12 months
In patients with e antigen positivity and hepatitis B viral DNA
greater than 105 who have an elevated ALT consideration for interferon
might be a first-line option. If the hepatitis B viral DNA is significantly
high then oral treatment with Adefovir or lamivudine is preferred.
Again, it is important to remember the limitations of the lamivudine
with its high incidence of development of resistance. This has made
Adefovir recently the more favorable choice.
In e antigen negative, HBV – DNA positive
patients (pre-core mutants), one must consider the poorer prognosis.
For this reason, the threshold for treatment includes lower hepatitis
B viral DNA levels, i.e.-104. Patients who are e antigen negative
with hepatitis B viral DNA levels greater than 104are recommended
treatment. Again those that have elevated ALT are more likely to
respond to interferon, and therefore, interferon may be considered
as a first line option. If the ALT is normal, the likelihood of interferon
therapy success is less, and a liver biopsy may become very important
in consideration if disease is present. Those patients who have less
than 104 DNA threshold level do not need treatment and should be
monitored every 6-to-12 months. Treatment including monitoring hepatitis
B viral DNA levels and ALT levels should be performed every 6 months.
All cirrhotic patients should be treated with viral suppression regardless
of the level of DNA. Adefovir is preferred for decompensated cirrhotic
patients. Monitoring these patients should occur every 3 months. These
patients should be considered for transplantation.
Lamivudine Resistance
Patients who have been treated with lamivudine and have developed
resistance to lamivudine present a particular problem. In noncirrhotic
patients, the accepted practice is to discontinue the lamivudine and
start adefovir. This can often be heralded by a flare in ALT levels.
For this reason cirrhotic patients present a particular problem, especially
if they are decompensated. Patients who are decompensated cirrhotics
who develop lamivudine resistance should have adefovir added without
lamivudine withdrawal.
Download PowerPoint slide showing Cumulative Rates of Detection of
Lamivudine-resistant M552V/I Mutants
Consideration for Oral Therapy
Withdrawal Compensated hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive patients should
be treated until hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and undetectable
hepatitis B viral DNA levels by PCR occur and then treat it for an
additional six months before withdrawing therapy. Patients with cirrhosis
and/or end stage liver disease should have continuous treatment without
withdrawal of oral suppression. These patients are not candidates for
interferon.
Other Monitoring Suggestions
Renal function is particularly important in monitoring decompensated
patients on adefovir therapy. Dosing adjustments need to be made depending
on creatinine clearance. Patients who have creatinine clearance less
than 50 but greater than 20 should be given adefovir every 48 hours
rather than every 24 hours. Patients with creatinine clearance 10-to-19
should be given 10 mg of adefovir every 72 hours, and hemodialysis
patients should be treated with Adefovir 10 mg every 7 days post hemodialysis.
Dose adjustments for lamivudine are also important.
Monitoring for a development of resistance is important. Resistance
is defined by a greater than one-log10 increase in serum hepatitis
B viral DNA level from the patients lowest on treatment level occurring
in two sequential occasions. Patients on lamivudine should be monitored
every three-to-six months. Patients with Adefovir should be monitored
every six months. The development of resistance with lamivudine or
Adefovir does not negate the fact of the other medication.
In conclusion, hepatitis B virus represents a significant yet treatable
disease in the United States. Worldwide, 350 million people are chronically
infected with hepatitis B. In the United States, it is estimated that
1.25 million individuals are infected with 100,000 people being acutely
infected each year. The incidence of acute infection hepatitis B has
dropped dramatically in the United States secondary to the current
vaccination program.
Hepatitis B is treatable with current regimens. The most utilized
regimen at this time is Adefovir. Goals of treatment should be seroconversion
of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) to hepatitis B e antibody (HBeAb)
and/or the lowest possible reduction of hepatitis B viral DNA levels
with the hope to eliminate hepatitis B viral DNA from the serum as
the ultimate achievement.
Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma is especially important in
those patients in the high-risk group and patients who already have
the development of cirrhosis. Newer treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma
including transplantation are dependent on the early discovery of this
cancer.
Suggested Reading
- Keeffe, E.B. et al. A Treatment Algorithm for
the Management of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United
States. Clinic Gastroenterology and Heptology 2004; 2:87-106
- Papatheodoridis
G.V. et al. Current Management of Chronic Hepatitis B. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther 2004: 19(1):25-37
- Lok A. SF et al. Chronic Hepatitis
B. Hepatology. 2001; 34:1225-1241
|